Edited by the Institute for Social Research, Swinburne University of Technology

Social inclusion in Australia: How Australia is faring

image: report - Social inclusion in Australia

22 January 2010While most Australians live well, there are some groups who are doing it very tough, according to this report. Approximately 5% of Australians aged 15 years and over experience three or more types of disadvantage. While most Australians are employed, 15% of all Australian children live in jobless families. Most Australians have high life expectancies but some groups, such as Indigenous people, have much lower expectancies (10 to 12 years lower).

To make matters worse for some Australians, disadvantage in one area is often shown to be associated with disadvantage in other respects. For example, the Board’s report finds that low income households often have poorer health and/or more difficulty accessing transport and other essential services. 35% of people with low incomes reported fair or poor health compared to only 7% with high incomes. 10% of people with low incomes have difficulty accessing transport compared to only 1% of people with high incomes. People with low incomes are also less likely to have access to the internet at home (33% compared to 85% with high incomes).

Similarly, people living in areas of low socioeconomic status tend to have lower levels of involvement in many aspects of community life.  People living in the most disadvantaged 20% of regions are shown to be much more likely to be unemployed, more likely to have children who are developmentally vulnerable, less likely to have Year 12 or equivalent at ages 20 to 24, less likely to participate in a community group and less likely to have a say in decisions that affect them.
This report sets the baseline for measuring progress on reducing disadvantage in Australia and provides a platform for the Board to address the topic of breaking the cycle of disadvantage over the coming year.

Comments

Unemployment affects the whole economy, not just those unfortunate to be unemployed. Recently, there is a lowering of the Colorado minimum wage presents some interesting problems. For one, it means that people making the least you can are now earning less (as if that rich/poor gap wasn’t big enough) but also that employers have to keep above it to stay competitive. Granted, the federal minimum wage does set a price floor for labor. If this scenario continues what will be the lifestyle of the people? Nonetheless, the unemployed have skills and training that are not being utilized in production. National income and production could grow, if these people were gainfully working.
The social inclusion agenda that is currently pushed by the Australian government fails in several ways. The units that are suggested are meaningless. Take the number of incidents of child abuse. In this case, currently each state and territory define the requirements for reporting abuse differently, therefore no compatibility. Do the numbers reported refer to a small number of families with high reporting rates or to a larger group of families with smaller reporting rates. If there 30 children with an average number of reports of 100 therefore there are 3000 incidences of abuse, but what if there are 120 children with an average of 25 reports each there are still 3000 incidences of abuse. There is still an element of racism in the assumptions and measures used. As the questions inter-group and intra-group cohesion are not addressed. A person within their own social group could be very cohesive, but chose not to participate in the activities of other groups. This non-participation is viewed as being non-cohesive behaviour. There are several basic issues that seemed to be missing, such as housing affordability choices. The location of many persons is determined by the type of access they have to the housing market. As housing affordability has some spatial dimensions, there be some social and segregation arising on housing access. The questions of appropriate geography has not been addressed yet. There no nationally agreed reporting geographies. The problems associated with the multiple areal unit problem and the ecological fallacy have not yet been resolved.

Events

18 Mar 2010 - 9:00am - 30 Mar 2010 - 5:30pm
Brisbane, Canberra, Melbourne
Conference
25 Mar 2010 - 26 Mar 2010
Sydney

Noticeboard

16 February 2010

RMIT University in Melbourne runs a degree program where groups of
communication research‐trained students work on a communication research
project for a not‐for‐profit client.

14 January 2010

The National Prison Book Program provides prisoners with free reading materials. Our aim is to provide books to prisoners and enhance prison library and educational services.

13 January 2010

ACCAN is establishing an Independent Grants Panel (‘the Panel’) to make recommendations about the allocation of Grants. We are calling for Expressions of Interest to join the Panel which has three (3) positions available.